Education is essential to success for children around the world. What authority does a parent have in deciding the type of education his or her child receives? What deference should be given to a parent’s religious, moral, and philosophical convictions?
This semester, Joshua Barbosa, Destinee Easley, and I have performed research on the way other jurisdictions (especially other common law countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa) have handled the intricate relationship between parental religious, philosophical, and moral convictions, and the sway such convictions should give to the type of education offered to their child. Furthermore, we have looked to international conventions, such as the European Convention on Human Rights, and to how those conventions have been applied to domestic courts in other countries.
This post was written
by a Center for Global Justice student staff member. The views expressed
in this post do not necessarily reflect those of Regent University, Regent Law
School, or the Center for Global Justice.
No comments:
Post a Comment